Why the study?
Conventional point-by-point mapping for atrioventricular accessory pathways relies on accurate interpretation of local electrograms, which can be challenging and time-consuming.
Open-window mapping is presented as an alternative to conventional point-by-point mapping for localizing accessory pathways.
May expedite accessory pathway localization in select cases; leaves open comparative efficacy versus point-by-point mapping.
The conventional mapping approach for atrioventricular accessory pathways (APs) typically involves a point-by-point mapping technique. This method aims to identify the specific connection sites of the AP to either the atria or the ventricles. However, this approach relies on the accurate interpretation of local electrograms, which can be challenging and time-consuming. In recent years, there have been reports highlighting the efficacy of an alternative mapping technique called open-window mapping (OWM) for localizing APs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nakatani et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: