Key result
Broad accessory pathways on open-window mapping are linked to ~60% lower first RF application success.
Why the study?
This study aimed to determine the utility of open-window mapping in visualizing the location and width of accessory pathways in patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome.
Does open-window mapping facilitate the visualization and ablation of accessory pathways in patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome?
Observational (n=30)
Yes
Does open-window mapping facilitate the visualization and ablation of accessory pathways in patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome?
Open-window mapping effectively visualizes accessory pathways in WPW syndrome, helping to identify broad pathways that may require multiple radiofrequency applications.
Open-window mapping flags broad pathways needing multiple radiofrequency applications; leaves open whether routine adoption improves ablation outcomes in WPW.
BACKGROUND: Open-window mapping (OWM) is a novel automated mapping method for catheter ablation of an accessory pathway (AP), in which the local signal is annotated with window-of-interest parameters to analyze both atrial and ventricular signals. This study aimed to determine the utility of OWM in visualizing the location and width of APs in patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome. METHODS: This two-center study enrolled 30 patients (20 males; mean age: 56 years, interquartile range [IQR]: 22-69 years) who underwent high-density OWM with the extended early-meets-late (EEML) algorithm using a 20-electrode, 5-spline catheter (PENTARAY, Biosense Webster). The lower threshold of the EEML was set to adjust the EEML gap to match the propagation mapping, and broad APs were defined as an EEML gap > 1 cm. RESULTS: The median mapping points, mapping time, and lower threshold of the EEML were 2482 (IQR: 1755-4000) points, 23 (IQR: 15-30) min, and 23 (IQR: 18-25), respectively. All 30 APs (24 in the mitral annulus and 6 in the tricuspid annulus) were successfully eliminated. Of these APs, 21 (70%) were eliminated by the first radio frequency (RF) application. OWM revealed broad APs in 11 patients (37%), in four of whom (36%) the first RF application achieved a loss of AP conduction (vs. 90% of patients without broad APs; p = .004). CONCLUSION: OWM facilitates the visualization of the location and width of APs, which may be particularly useful for predicting whether multiple RF applications are required for broad APs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yagishita et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome (n=30). Broad accessory pathways identified by open-window mapping vs. Patients without broad accessory pathways was evaluated on Elimination of accessory pathway by the first radiofrequency application (p=0.004). Open-window mapping identified broad accessory pathways, which had a lower rate of elimination by the first radiofrequency application compared to non-broad pathways (36% vs 90%; p=0.004).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: