Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Research has established the multidimensional nature of student ratings of teaching, but debate continues concerning the use of multiple- versus single-item ratings for summative evaluation. In this study the usefulness of global items in predicting weighted-composite evaluations of teaching was evaluated with a sample of 17,183 classes from 105 institutions. In separate regression analyses containing 2 global items―one concerning the instructor, the other concerning the course―each global item accounted for more than 50% of the variance in the weightedcomposite criterion measure. Student, class, and method items generally added much less variance
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cashin et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: