Key result
The combination of BNP ≥350 pg/mL and thoracic fluid content ≥35/kOmega identified diastolic dysfunction with 95% sensitivity and 94% specificity (P<0.001).
Why the study?
Does the combination of BNP levels and transthoracic bioimpedance accurately identify diastolic dysfunction in patients with chronic advanced systolic heart failure?
Cross-Sectional (n=120)
Does the combination of BNP levels and transthoracic bioimpedance accurately identify diastolic dysfunction in patients with chronic advanced systolic heart failure?
p-value: p=<0.001
The combination of BNP and transthoracic bioimpedance provides a highly sensitive and specific non-invasive screening tool for identifying diastolic dysfunction in patients with advanced systolic heart failure.
May support non-invasive screening in advanced systolic HF; hypothesis-generating, requiring prospective validation before practice change.
AIMS: Diastolic dysfunction in patients with heart failure has prognostic relevance, possibly because of its relationship with worsening haemodynamic status. In the quest for simpler indexes of haemodynamic status in patients, brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels have been proposed as a surrogate of diastolic function. To date, the value of combining BNP levels with non-invasive haemodynamic monitoring by transthoracic electric bioimpedance (TEB) for the prediction of diastolic function has not been evaluated. METHODS AND RESULTS: We compared left ventricular diastolic function measured by tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) with TEB results and BNP levels in 120 patients with chronic advanced systolic heart failure on optimal treatment (70 +/- 9 years, NYHA 2.4 +/- 0.8, ejection fraction 31 +/- 5%). Of the TEB variables measured, we only considered thoracic fluid content (TFC). To describe diastolic function, we used the TDI of the velocity of displacement of the mitral annulus (E') and the ratio E/E'. In all patients, E/E' was significantly related to TFC and to BNP levels (P < 0.001). Moreover, the combination of BNP > or = 350 pg/mL and TFC > or = 35/kOmega identified patients with diastolic dysfunction (defined as E/E' > or = 15) with high sensitivity and specificity (95 and 94%, respectively). CONCLUSION: The combination of transthoracic bioimpedance monitoring and BNP measurement accurately indicated the presence of diastolic dysfunction in most patients. These user-friendly and operator-independent tools may be useful as a screening assessment for diastolic dysfunction, and consequently abnormal central haemodynamic status, either in ambulatory patients or when an adequate echocardiographic evaluation is not readily available.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Malfatto et al. (2010) conducted a cross-sectional in Chronic advanced systolic heart failure (n=120). Combination of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and transthoracic electric bioimpedance (TEB) vs. Tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) was evaluated on Identification of diastolic dysfunction (defined as E/E' ≥ 15) (p=<0.001). The combination of BNP ≥350 pg/mL and thoracic fluid content ≥35/kOmega identified diastolic dysfunction with 95% sensitivity and 94% specificity (P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: