PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 18, 2022International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health61 citationsOpen Access

Effects of Physical Exercise on Executive Function in Adults with Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

FCFalonn Contreras-OsorioRRRodrigo Ramírez‐CampilloECEnrique Cerda-Vega

Key Result

Physical exercise improved working memory in adults with mild-to-moderate depression compared with controls (Hedges' g 0.33; 95% CI 0.04-0.61; p=0.026).

Study Design

Type

Meta-Analysis (n=659)

Structured PICO

Does physical exercise improve executive function in adults with depression?

P
Population
7 studies pooling 659 adults (202 men, 457 women) with mild-moderate depression, age 21.0-51.2 years.
I
Intervention
Physical exercise programs
C
Comparator
Active and passive control conditions
O
Outcome
Executive functions (working memory, inhibition, cognitive flexibility)surrogate

Physical exercise interventions may improve working memory in adults with mild-to-moderate depression, though evidence is limited by the small number of high-quality studies.

Main Result

Effect estimate: Hedges' g 0.33 (95% CI 0.04-0.61)

p-value: p=0.026

Limitations

  • Reduced number of available high-quality studies
  • reduced number of available high-quality studies

Abstract

Executive function is among the most affected cognitive dimensions in depression. Physical exercise may improve executive function (e.g., working memory, inhibition, cognitive flexibility), although this is without consensus on adults with depression. Through this systematic review, we aim to elucidate the effects of physical exercise programs on executive functions in adults with depression. The literature search was performed in four relevant electronic databases, combining keywords and medical subject headings, from inception until September 2022. Controlled interventions, involving adults with depression, and reporting working memory, inhibition, and/or cognitive flexibility pre-post-intervention data, were considered includable. Results from meta-analyses included effect size (ES, i.e., Hedges’ g) values reported with 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs), with p set at ≤0.05. Seven studies were included, including 202 men and 457 women (age: 21.0–51.2 years; mild–moderate depression). For working memory, a small favoring effect was observed in the experimental groups compared with controls (ES = 0.33, 95%CI = 0.04–0.61; p = 0.026; I2 = 64.9%). For inhibition, physical exercise had a small favoring non-significant effect compared with controls (ES = 0.28, 95%CI = −0.17–0.74; p = 0.222; I2 = 72.4%). Compared with the control group, physical exercise had a trivial effect on cognitive flexibility (ES = 0.09, 95%CI = −0.21–0.39; p = 0.554; I2 = 68.4%). In conclusion, physical exercise interventions may improve working memory behavioral measures in adults with mild-to-moderate depression when compared with active and passive control conditions. However, the reduced number of available high-quality studies precludes more lucid conclusions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Contreras-Osorio et al. (2022) conducted a meta-analysis in Mild-to-moderate depression (n=659). Physical exercise vs. Active and passive control conditions was evaluated on Working memory (Hedges' g 0.33, 95% CI 0.04-0.61, p=0.026). Physical exercise improved working memory in adults with mild-to-moderate depression compared with controls (Hedges' g 0.33; 95% CI 0.04-0.61; p=0.026).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1d5d87266863fda62f25d3https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192215270
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper