Key result
Integrating mechanobiology, metabolism, and physics provides a novel framework for understanding brain and metabolic diseases.
Why the study?
A molecular-centric approach has overshadowed the role of physical processes in cellular homeostasis, which may account for unexplained phenotypic heterogeneity in inherited metabolic diseases.
This perspective highlights the emerging field of mechanobiology in neuroscience, emphasizing how physical forces and mechanotransduction regulate brain metabolism in health and disease.
Advances in molecular biology have shaped our understanding of cellular biology. Yet, this molecular-centric approach has overshadowed the role of physical processes governing cellular homeostasis. In genetic disorders, particularly inherited metabolic diseases, phenotypic heterogeneity cannot solely be explained by genetic variants. Mechanical properties of cells and tissues may account for this variability, given the interplay between biological and physical cues in metabolic regulations. In July 2024, we organized an international symposium with world experts in physics, chemistry, and neurobiology to explore the physical regulation of brain metabolism in health and disease. Topics included mechanotransduction in neurodevelopment and brain aging, the physics of neurotransmission and cellular trafficking, and emerging methods to model cellular metabolism, analyze single-cell mechanical and transcriptional signals, and track nanoparticles in intact brain tissue. This effort aims to foster an interdisciplinary framework for neuroscience and train scientists across disciplines, while integrating art to stimulate creativity and integrative thinking.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mochel et al. (2026) conducted a review in Inherited metabolic diseases and brain functions. Integrating mechanobiology, cellular metabolism, and physics provides a novel interdisciplinary framework for understanding brain functions, neurodevelopment, and inherited metabolic diseases.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: