Why the study?
Does the cannulation site of an LVAD (LAAO vs LVAO) affect pumping efficacy in heart failure with mitral or aortic regurgitation?
Does the cannulation site of an LVAD (LAAO vs LVAO) affect pumping efficacy in heart failure with mitral or aortic regurgitation?
Computational modeling suggests that LVAD cannulation from the left atrium to the aorta is optimal for HF with mitral regurgitation, while left ventricle to aorta cannulation is better for aortic regurgitation.
Hypothesis-generating for LVAD cannulation choice in MR or AR; prospective human studies needed before clinical adoption.
Mitral valve regurgitation (MR) causes blood to flow in two directions during contraction of the left ventricle (LV), that is, forward into the aorta and backward into the left atrium (LA). In aortic valve regurgitation (AR), leakage occurs from the aorta into the LV during diastole. Our objective is to analyze the contribution of a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) to MR and AR for the following two different cannulation sites: from the LA to the aorta (LAAO) and from the LV to the aorta (LVAO). Using a computational method, we simulated three ventricular conditions (normal [HF without valvular regurgitation], 5% MR, and 5% AR) in three groups (control [no LVAD], LAAO, and LVAO). The results showed that LVAD with LAAO cannulation is appropriate for recovery of the MR heart, and the LVAD with LVAO cannulation is appropriate for treating the AR heart.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Heikhmakhtiar et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: