Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We accurately determine a new Cepheid distance to M101 (NGC 5457) using archival HST/ACS V and I time series photometry of two fields within the galaxy. We make a slight modification to the ISIS image subtraction package to obtain optimal differential light curves from HST data. We discovered 827 Cepheids with periods between 3 and 80 days, the largest extragalactic sample of Cepheids observed with HST by a factor of 2. With this large Cepheid sample we find that the relative distance of M101 from the LMC is delta {μ}LMC = 10.63 ± 0.04 (random) ± 0.07 (systematic) mag. If we use the geometrically determined maser distance to NGC 4258 as our distance anchor, the distance modulus of M101 is {μ}0 = 29.04 ± 0.05 (random) ± 0.18 (systematic) mag or D = 6.4 ± 0.2 (random) ± 0.5 (systematic) Mpc. The uncertainty is dominated by the maser distance estimate (± 0.15 mag), which should improve over the next few years. We determine a steep metallicity dependence, gamma, for our Cepheid sample through two methods, yielding gamma = -0.84 ± 0.22 (random) ± 0.07 (systematic) mag dex-1 and gamma = -0.72+0.20 -0.22 (random) ± 0.06 (systematic) mag dex-1. We see marginal evidence for variations in the Wesenheit P-L relation slope as a function of deprojected galactocentric radius. We also use the TRGB method to independently determine the distance modulus to M101 of {μ}0 = 29.05 ± 0.06 (random) ± 0.12 (systematic) mag.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shappee et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: