Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: Percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion (CTO-PCI) success rates have increased with adoption of the retrograde approach. We evaluated the role of the retrograde approach in CTO-PCI from the analysis of the Japanese Retrograde Summit Registry. Methods and Findings: We analysed 3,229 consecutive PCIs in 56 Japanese centres and included in this registry in January 2012âÂÃÃÂÂÂÂÃÂÂÂÂÃÃÂÂÂÂÃÂÂÂDecember 2013. We analysed background characteristics and procedure outcomes of the following groups: A, succeeded using only the antegrade approach; R, succeeded using the retrograde approach; RA, succeeded using the antegrade approach after failure of the retrograde approach; F, failed. Success in initial approach was obtained in 2,854 procedures (88.4%). Procedure numbers and rates in each group were: A, n=2,016 (62.4%); R, n=658 (20.4%); RA, n=180, 5.6%); Group F, n=375 (11.6%). J-CTO scores were 1.24 ± 0.95, 2.16±1.06, 1.69±1.04, and 2.00±1.07, respectively (p<0.0001). Average procedure time was >180 minutes and average air kerma >5 Gy. Overall in-hospital MACCE rate was 0.53%, and was high in Groups R and F (P<0.0001). Conclusions: Procedure success was achieved using only the antegrade approach in many cases. The retrograde approach succeeded even in difficult CTO-PCI cases. Limitations included large amounts of contrast agent, high-dose fluoroscopy, and high complication rate. Therefore, further developments are still required.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sekiguchi et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: