In women aged ≤65 years hospitalized for an acute coronary event, diabetes mellitus and having an AMI as the index event are strong predictors of long-term adverse cardiac outcomes.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May aid risk stratification after ACS in younger women; leaves open whether targeted interventions improve outcomes.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the importance of different clinical parameters predicting long-term cardiac prognosis in younger women with an acute coronary event. DESIGN: The Stockholm Female Coronary Risk Study is a follow-up study in women </=65 years. SETTING: Patients were included between 1991 and 1994 from all 10 coronary care or intensive care units in the greater Stockholm area. SUBJECTS: A total of 335 consecutive female patients hospitalized for an acute coronary event. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cardiac death and nonfatal myocardial infarction (AMI). RESULTS: During the follow-up period of 5 years there were 26 (8%) all cause deaths and 39 (12%) recurrent cardiac events. In the group that participated in the complete study, the following age adjusted parameters were found as strong predictors of adverse outcome: AMI as index event [Hazard Ratio (HR) 9.13, 95% CI 3.09-26.99], diabetes mellitus (HR 4.13, 95% CI 1.68-10.17), left ventricular dysfunction (HR 3.94, 95% CI 1.52-10.17), serum HDL cholesterol <1.0 mmol L-1 (HR 4.01, 95% CI 1.62-6.12), and serum triglycerides >2.0 mmol L-1 (HR 2.46, 95% CI 1.06-5.54). AMI as index event and diabetes mellitus were the most significant predictors in a multivariate statistical model. Diabetes mellitus was the strongest predictor when the analysis was repeated in the total patient cohort, integrating patients that did not participate in the extended investigations. CONCLUSION: Women aged </=65-year-old hospitalized for an acute coronary event has a low rate of cardiac events during the following 5-year period. Easily obtained clinical variables such as diabetes mellitus predict adverse prognosis and implicates a need for a more active diagnostic and treatment strategy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Al‐Khalili et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: