Key result
A single-stage stepwise endo-/epicardial catheter ablation resulted in 88% freedom from atrial fibrillation or atrial tachycardia after a median follow-up of 266 days.
Why the study?
Outcomes of catheter ablation in patients with non-paroxysmal AF remain largely disappointing, prompting evaluation of a single-stage stepwise endo-/epicardial approach.
Does single-stage stepwise endo-/epicardial catheter ablation improve freedom from atrial fibrillation/atrial tachycardia in patients with symptomatic persistent/longstanding-persistent atrial fibrillation and prior endocardial procedures?
Observational (n=25)
Does single-stage stepwise endo-/epicardial catheter ablation improve freedom from atrial fibrillation/atrial tachycardia in patients with symptomatic persistent/longstanding-persistent atrial fibrillation and prior endocardial procedures?
A single-stage stepwise endo-/epicardial catheter ablation approach shows high rates of rhythm control and symptom improvement in patients with refractory persistent or longstanding-persistent atrial fibrillation.
May support hybrid ablation in refractory persistent AF; leaves open need for randomized confirmation of efficacy and safety.
Background: Outcomes of catheter ablation (CA) among patients with non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) are largely disappointing. Objective: We sought to evaluate the feasibility, effectiveness, and safety of a single-stage stepwise endo-/epicardial approach in patients with persistent/longstanding-persistent AF. Methods: We enrolled 25 consecutive patients with symptomatic persistent (n=4) or longstanding-persistent (n=21) AF and at least one prior endocardial procedure, who underwent CA using an endo-/epicardial approach. Our anatomical stepwise protocol included multiple endocardial as well as epicardial (Bachmann’s bundle [BB] and ligament of Marshall ablations) components, and entailed ablation of atrial tachycardias emerging during the procedure. The primary outcome was freedom from any AF/atrial tachycardia episode after a 3-month blanking period. The secondary outcome was patients’ symptom status during follow-up. Results: The stepwise endo-/epicardial approach allowed sinus rhythm restoration in 72% of patients, either directly (n=6, 24%) or after AF organization into atrial tachycardia (n=12, 48%). BB’s ablation was commonly implicated in arrhythmia termination. After a median follow-up of 266 days (interquartile range, 96 days), survival free from AF/atrial tachycardia was 88%. Antiarrhythmic drugs could be discontinued in 22 patients (88%). As compared to baseline, more patients were asymptomatic at 9-month follow-up (0% vs- 56%, p=0.02). Five patients (20%) developed mild medical complications, whereas one subject (4%) had severe kidney injury requiring dialysis. Conclusion: a single-stage endo-/epicardial CA resulted in favorable rhythm and symptom outcomes in a cohort of patients with symptomatic persistent/longstanding-persistent AF and one or more prior endocardial procedures. Epicardial ablation of BB was commonly implicated in procedural success.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Martino et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Symptomatic persistent or longstanding-persistent atrial fibrillation (n=25). Single-stage stepwise endo-/epicardial catheter ablation was evaluated on Freedom from any AF/atrial tachycardia episode after a 3-month blanking period. A single-stage stepwise endo-/epicardial catheter ablation resulted in 88% freedom from atrial fibrillation or atrial tachycardia after a median follow-up of 266 days.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: