Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective: We performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the efficacy of interleukin-2 (IL-2) for the treatment of patientswith unresectable or metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC).Methods: We searched the literature to identify RCTs or meta-analyses of RCTscomparing treatment regimens with IL-2 to those without. Outcomes of interestincluded overall or progression-free survival, response rate, toxicity andquality of life.Results: We identified 36 RCTs, and 6 met the eligibility criteria (1098 patients).We studied IL-2 alone and in combination with other agents, including interferon-alpha (IFN-a), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and 13-cis-retinoic acid or tamoxifen.No trials comparing high-dose IL-2 to non-IL-2 regimens were identified.A meta-analysis of 1-year mortality data from the 6 trials did not show a differencebetween IL-2-based regimens and non-IL-2 controls. Two of the 6trials detected statistically significant longer survival with IL-2 combinedwith IFN-a and 5-FU. Of the 4 trials that assessed progression-free survival, 3 reported significantly longer progression-free intervals with IL-2-based regimens.Five trials reported response rates; pooling the rates from these trialsgave an overall weighted response rate of 13.3% (range 9%–39%) and 5.3%(range 0%–20%) for IL-2-containing regimens and non-IL-2 regimens, respectively.IL-2-based regimens were more toxic than were non-IL-2 controls;the most frequently reported grade 3–4 toxicities were hypotension (range6%–68%), fever (2%–56%), nausea or vomiting or both (6%–34%), diarrhea(1%–28%) and cardiac toxicity (11%–25%). None of the trials reported healthrelatedquality-of-life data.Conclusion: Non-high-dose IL-2 containing regimens do not provide superiortreatment efficacy over non-IL-2-based regimens, with added toxicity, and thereforeshould not be used as standard treatment for patients with unresectableor metastatic RCC. High-dose IL-2 should only be used by experienced physiciansin the context of a clinical trial or investigative setting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hotte et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: