Key result
Brief RQA segments show ~80% correlation with standard electrogram recordings in persistent AF.
Why the study?
Does recurrence quantification analysis of shorter duration atrial electrograms accurately characterize atrial substrate compared to 8-second durations in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation?
Observational (n=18)
No
Does recurrence quantification analysis of shorter duration atrial electrograms accurately characterize atrial substrate compared to 8-second durations in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation?
Effect estimate: ρ ≥ 80%
p-value: p=<0.0001
Recurrence quantification analysis can effectively characterize atrial electrograms during persistent AF using shorter durations (≥3 s) than currently recommended, potentially aiding in substrate mapping during ablation.
Introduction The temporal behavior of atrial electrograms (AEGs) collected during persistent atrial fibrillation (persAF) directly affects ablative treatment outcomes. We investigated different durations of AEGs collected during persAF using recurrence quantification analysis (RQA). Methods 797 bipolar AEGs with different durations (from 0.5 s to 8 s) from 18 patients were investigated. Four RQA-based attributes were evaluated based on AEG durations: determinism (DET); recurrence rate (RR); laminarity (LAM); and diagonal lines’ entropy (ENTR). The Spearman correlation (ρ) between each duration versus 8 s was calculated. AEG classification was performed following the CARTO criteria (Biosense Webster) and receiving operating characteristic (ROC) curves were created for the RQA variables. Results The RQA variables successfully discriminated the AEGs: the area under the ROC curves were as high as 0.70 for AEGs with 3.5 s or greater. Three types of AEGs were found using these variables: normal, fractionated and temporally unstable. The number of unstable AEGs decreased with longer AEG segments. Different AEG durations significantly affected the RQA variables (P<0.0001), with no statistical difference between the durations 6 s, 7 s and 8 s for DET, LAM and ENTR, and no difference between 7 s and 8 s for RR (P<0.0001). AEGs with 3 s or longer have shown ρ ≥ 80% for all variables. Conclusion The RQA variables have been shown effective in the characterization of AEGs collected during persAF with a shorter duration than current recommendations, which motivates their use for the characterization of atrial substrate during persAF ablation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Almeida et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Persistent atrial fibrillation (n=18). Recurrence quantification analysis (RQA) of shorter atrial electrogram durations vs. 8-second atrial electrogram duration was evaluated on Correlation of RQA variables between shorter AEG durations and 8-second duration (ρ ≥ 80%, p=<0.0001). Recurrence quantification analysis variables effectively characterized atrial electrograms during persistent atrial fibrillation using segments as short as 3 seconds, showing ≥80% correlation with standard 8-second recordings.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: