Why the study?
Does extending atrial electrogram recording duration beyond 2.5 seconds improve the temporal consistency of fractionation classification in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation?
Does extending atrial electrogram recording duration beyond 2.5 seconds improve the temporal consistency of fractionation classification in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation?
In persistent AF, standard 2.5-second electrogram recordings are temporally unstable in nearly 30% of cases, suggesting longer recordings (≥5 seconds) are needed for consistent ablation target identification.
The unstable temporal behavior of atrial electrical activity during persistent atrial fibrillation (persAF) might influence ablation target identification, which could explain the conflicting persAF ablation outcomes in previous studies. We sought to investigate the temporal behavior and consistency of atrial electrogram (AEG) fractionation using different segment lengths. Seven hundred ninety-seven bipolar AEGs were collected with three segment lengths (2.5, 5,and 8 s) from 18 patients undergoing persAF ablation. The AEGs with 8-s duration were divided into three 2.5-s consecutive segments. AEG fractionation classification was applied off-line to all cases following the CARTO criteria; 43% of the AEGs remained fractionated for the three consecutive AEG segments, while nearly 30% were temporally unstable. AEG classification within the consecutive segments had moderate correlation (segment 1 vs 2: Spearman's correlation ρ = 0.74, kappa score κ = 0.62; segment 1 vs 3: ρ = 0.726, κ = 0.62; segment 2 vs 3: ρ = 0.75, κ = 0.68). AEG classifications were more similar between AEGs with 5 and 8 s (ρ = 0.96, κ = 0.87) than 2.5 versus 5 s (ρ = 0.93, κ = 0.84) and 2.5 versus 8 s (ρ = 0.90, κ = 0.78). Our results show that the CARTO criteria should be revisited and consider recording duration longer than 2.5 s for consistent ablation target identification in persAF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Almeida et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: