Key result
Combined aerobic and resistance training fails to improve pulse wave velocity in type 2 diabetes.
Why the study?
Aerobic plus machine-assisted resistance training is widely applied against vascular complications in T2DM, but whether it significantly improves vascular conditions remains controversial.
Does aerobic plus machine-assisted resistance training improve pulse wave velocity in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus?
Meta-Analysis (n=328)
Does aerobic plus machine-assisted resistance training improve pulse wave velocity in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus?
Aerobic plus machine-assisted resistance training did not significantly improve arterial stiffness (PWV) or systolic blood pressure in patients with T2DM, though it did significantly reduce HbA1c levels.
Aerobic plus resistance training does not reduce PWV or SBP in T2DM; challenges presumed vascular benefits while confirming HbA1c reduction.
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a chronic disease characterized by hyperglycemia, insulin resistance, and pancreatic B cell dysfunction. Hyperglycemia can cause several complications, including nephrological, neurological, ophthalmological, and vascular complications. Many modalities, such as medication, physical therapies, and exercise, are developed against vascular disorders. Among all exercise forms, aerobic plus machine-assisted resistance training is widely applied. However, whether this intervention can significantly improve vascular conditions remains controversial. In this study, an electronic search was processed for the Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane libraries for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy of aerobic plus machine-assisted resistance training with no exercise (control) on patients with T2DM. Pulse wave velocity (PWV), the index of arterial stiffness, was chosen as primary outcome. The reliability of the pooled outcome was tested by trial sequential analysis (TSA). Secondary outcomes included systolic blood pressure (SBP) and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c). Finally, five RCTs with a total of 328 patients were included. Compared with control, aerobic plus machine-assisted resistance training failed to provide significant improvement on PWV (MD −0.54 m/s, 95% CI [−1.69, 0.60], p = 0.35). On the other hand, TSA indicated that this results till needs more verifications. Additionally, this training protocol did not significantly decrease SBP (MD −1.05 mmHg, 95% CI [−3.71, 1.61], p = 0.44), but significantly reduced the level of HbA1c (MD −0.55%, 95% CI [−0.88, −0.22], p = 0.001). In conclusion, this meta-analysis failed to detect a direct benefit of aerobic plus machine-assisted resistance training on vascular condition in T2DM population. Yet the improvement in HbA1c implied a potential of this training method in mitigating vascular damage. More studies are needed to verify the benefit.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guo et al. (2022) conducted a meta-analysis in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (n=328). Aerobic plus machine-assisted resistance training vs. No exercise (control) was evaluated on Pulse wave velocity (PWV) (MD -0.54 m/s, 95% CI -1.69, 0.60, p=0.35). Aerobic plus machine-assisted resistance training did not significantly improve pulse wave velocity (MD -0.54 m/s) compared to no exercise in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: