Key result
Empagliflozin cuts primary composite events regardless of baseline MRA use.
Why the study?
Does empagliflozin reduce adverse clinical outcomes in patients with HFpEF regardless of background MRA use?
RCT (n=5,988)
Does empagliflozin reduce adverse clinical outcomes in patients with HFpEF regardless of background MRA use?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Empagliflozin provides consistent primary outcome benefits in HFpEF regardless of background MRA use, while also reducing the risk of hyperkalemia.
BACKGROUND: Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) may be beneficial in reducing heart failure (HF) hospitalizations in patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction. The effect of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction according to MRA background therapy has not been reported. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine the effect of empagliflozin in MRA users and nonusers in the EMPEROR-Preserved (Empagliflozin Outcome Trial in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction) trial. METHODS: Survival analyses were conducted comparing the effects of empagliflozin vs placebo in MRA users and nonusers at baseline with treatment-by-MRA use interaction terms. RESULTS: A total of 5,988 patients were included, of whom 2,244 (37.5%) were using MRAs at baseline. MRA users had higher event rates than MRA nonusers (placebo group primary outcome 9.4 vs 8.2 events per 100 person-years). The benefit of empagliflozin to reduce the primary outcome was not significantly different between MRA nonusers and MRA users (HR: 0.73 [95% CI: 0.62-0.87] and HR: 0.87 [95% CI: 0.71-1.06]; interaction P = 0.22). The effect of empagliflozin to reduce first and recurrent HF hospitalizations was more pronounced in MRA nonusers than in MRA users (HR: 0.60 [95% CI: 0.47-0.77] and HR: 0.90 [95% CI: 0.68-1.19]; interaction P = 0.038). MRA users experienced almost twice as many hyperkalemia events as MRA nonusers, and empagliflozin reduced the risk for hyperkalemia or initiation of potassium binders regardless of MRA use (MRA nonusers: HR: 0.90 [95% CI: 0.69-1.19]; MRA users: HR: 0.74 [95% CI: 0.56-0.96]; interaction P = 0.29). CONCLUSIONS: The benefit of empagliflozin to reduce the primary outcome was not significantly different between MRA nonusers and MRA users. The effect of empagliflozin to reduce first and recurrent HF hospitalizations was more pronounced in MRA nonusers. Empagliflozin reduced hyperkalemia, with no significant treatment-by-MRA subgroup interaction. (Empagliflozin Outcome Trial in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction [EMPEROR-Preserved]; NCT03057951).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ferreira et al. (2022) conducted an RCT in Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (n=5,988). Empagliflozin vs. Placebo was evaluated on primary outcome (HR 0.73 (MRA nonusers) and HR 0.87 (MRA users), 95% CI 0.62-0.87 (MRA nonusers) and 0.71-1.06 (MRA users), p=0.22 (interaction)). Empagliflozin reduced the primary outcome without significant difference between MRA nonusers (HR 0.73; 95% CI 0.62-0.87) and MRA users (HR 0.87; 95% CI 0.71-1.06; interaction P=0.22).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: