Key result
Persistent dual AV nodal physiology after cryoablation for AVNRT is not associated with higher recurrence rates than complete elimination if AVNRT remains non-inducible.
Why the study?
Does complete elimination of slow pathway conduction compared to persistent dual AV nodal physiology reduce recurrence in patients undergoing cryoablation for AVNRT?
Population
185 consecutive patients undergoing a first cryoablation procedure for atrioventricular nodal reentrant…
Comparison
Transcatheter cryoablation for AVNRT achieving… vs Transcatheter cryoablation for AVNRT achieving…
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
24 months
Authors
Loading...
May support accepting persistent dual physiology if AVNRT non-inducible after cryoablation; leaves open optimal endpoint in prospective trials.
Cohort (n=185)
No
Does complete elimination of slow pathway conduction compared to persistent dual AV nodal physiology reduce recurrence in patients undergoing cryoablation for AVNRT?
In patients undergoing cryoablation for AVNRT, leaving persistent dual AV nodal physiology does not increase recurrence risk as long as the tachycardia is non-inducible.
Khairy et al. (2007) conducted a cohort in Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) (n=185). Transcatheter cryoablation vs. Complete elimination of slow pathway conduction vs. persistent dual AV nodal physiology was evaluated on Recurrence of AVNRT. Persistent dual AV nodal physiology after cryoablation for AVNRT is not associated with higher recurrence rates than complete elimination if AVNRT remains non-inducible.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: