Key result
Dobutamine stress echocardiography showed mitral valve resistance increased in symptomatic patients (13.8 dynes sec/cm5) but decreased in asymptomatic patients (-27.8 dynes sec/cm5; P<0.001).
Why the study?
Does the change in mitral valve resistance during dobutamine stress echocardiography differentiate symptomatic from asymptomatic patients with mild-to-moderate mitral stenosis?
Observational (n=24)
Does the change in mitral valve resistance during dobutamine stress echocardiography differentiate symptomatic from asymptomatic patients with mild-to-moderate mitral stenosis?
Absolute Event Rate: 13.8% vs -27.8%
p-value: p=<0.001
Changes in mitral valve resistance during dobutamine stress echocardiography can help identify the hemodynamic significance of mild-to-moderate mitral stenosis and explain symptom status.
Mitral valve resistance changes on dobutamine stress echo may identify hemodynamically relevant mild-to-moderate mitral stenosis; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: Conventional stenosis indexes poorly reflect the major hemodynamic consequence of mitral stenosis (MS). Valve resistance (VR) is a physiologic expression of stenosis. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to demonstrate whether the mitral valve resistance (MVR) and its changes, relate to restricted exercise capacity in patients with mild and moderate mitral stenosis. METHODS: Twenty-four patients with rheumatic mild-to-moderate MS underwent transthoracic echocardiographic study (resting and dobutamine stress echocardiography [DSE]), divided into two groups; group I: symptomatic (12 patients) and group II: asymptomatic (12 patients). Mitral valve area (MVA), mean transmitral diastolic pressure gradient (TMPG), cardiac output (CO), and MVR were measured in all patients at rest and at peak DSE. Changes (∆) in MVA, TMPG, CO, and MVR were calculated. Data underwent statistical analysis. RESULTS: From resting to peak dobutamine infusion, the MVR significantly decreased from 111.4 ± 28.2 to 83.6 ± 27.0 dynes sec/cm(5) in group II (P < 0.001). The increase in MVR in group I (13.8 ± 10.3 dynes sec/cm(5)) compared with its reduction (-27.8 ± 15.6 dynes sec/cm(5)) in group II were highly significant different (P < 0.001). A reduction in MVR by less than 21.5 dynes sec/cm(5) at peak dobutamine infusion reflect a cutoff value considered to detect the hemodynamic significance of mild-to-moderate MS with a sensitivity of 92% and a specificity of 73%. CONCLUSION: The changes in the MVR can be used as a DSE parameter for expression of stenosis severity and to describe discrepancy in symptom status in patients with mild-to-moderate mitral stenosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Roshdy et al. (2013) conducted an observational in Rheumatic mild-to-moderate mitral stenosis (n=24). Dobutamine stress echocardiography vs. Asymptomatic patients was evaluated on Change in mitral valve resistance (MVR) from rest to peak dobutamine infusion (p=<0.001). Dobutamine stress echocardiography showed mitral valve resistance increased in symptomatic patients (13.8 dynes sec/cm5) but decreased in asymptomatic patients (-27.8 dynes sec/cm5; P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: