Mitral valve resistance determines hemodynamic consequences of severe rheumatic mitral stenosis and immediate outcomes of percutaneous valvuloplasty

Introduction The mitral valve area (MVA) poorly reflects the hemodynamic status of (MS). In this study, we compared the MVA with mitral valve resistance (MVR) with regard to the determination of hemodynamic consequences of MS and the immediate outcomes of percutaneous balloon mitral valvuloplasty (PBMV). Methods In a prospective study, 36 patients with severe rheumatic MS with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) >50% were evaluated. They underwent transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and catheterization. The MVA was measured by two‐dimensional planimetry and pressure half‐time (PHT), and the MVR was calculated using the equation: 1333 × transmitral pressure gradient mean transmitral diastolic flow rate. Results The patients’ mean age was 47.8±10.5 years. MVR ≥140.6 dynes·s/cm5 detected systolic pulmonary arterial pressure (sPAP) >55 mm Hg with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 74%. The sensitivity and specificity of MVA<0.75 cm2 to discriminate elevated sPAP were 81% and 89%, respectively. PHT ≥323.5 mseconds had a sensitivity of 78% and a specificity of 96% to detect an elevated sPAP. To predict a successful PBMV, preprocedural MVR ≥106.1 dynes·s/cm5 had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 67% (area under the curve [AUC]=0.763; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.520‐1.006; P=.034); preprocedural MVA <0.95 cm2 had a sensitivity of 78% and a specificity of 73% (AUC=0.730; 95% CI=0.503‐0.956; P=.065); and preprocedural PHT ≥210.5 mseconds had a sensitivity of 73% and a specificity of 78% (AUC=0.707; 95% CI=0.474‐0.941; P=.095). Conclusions MVR seems to be more accurate than MVA in determining the hemodynamic consequences of severe MS as determined by sPAP. In addition, preprocedural MVR detected successful PBMVs.