Key result
Single-leg cycling resulted in lower normalized power output (8.92 vs 10.41 W/kg; p<0.05) but greater oxygen consumption and cardiac output compared with double-leg cycling in healthy adults.
Why the study?
The acute performance, cardiovascular, and local muscular responses to perceived exertion-based high-intensity interval exercise using double- versus single-leg cycling had not been characterized.
Does single-leg cycling alter power output, oxygen consumption, and cardiac output compared with double-leg cycling in healthy middle-aged adults?
Does single-leg cycling alter power output, oxygen consumption, and cardiac output compared with double-leg cycling in healthy middle-aged adults?
Absolute Event Rate: 8.92% vs 10.41%
p-value: p=< 0.05
Single-leg cycling elicits higher cardiac output relative to lean mass without greater power output, suggesting a dissociation between blood availability and power output in middle-aged adults.
Single-leg cycling may dissociate cardiac output from power output; hypothesis-generating for exercise testing, with validation needed in patients.
This study examined the acute performance, cardiovascular and local muscular responses to perceived exertion‐based high‐intensity interval exercise using either double‐ or single‐leg cycling. Fifteen healthy middle‐aged adults completed, on separate occasions, ten 30‐s double‐leg intervals interspersed with 60 s passive recovery and twenty (ten with each leg) 30‐s single‐leg intervals interspersed with 60 s passive recovery. Impedance cardiography, blood pressure, muscle oxygenation and total haemoglobin content (near‐infrared spectroscopy), oxygen consumption and power output were measured throughout each session. Normalised to the lean mass used during each trial, single‐leg cycling resulted in lower power output (single‐leg: 8.92 ± 1.74 W kg −1 and double‐leg: 10.41 ± 3.22 W kg −1 ; p < 0.05) but greater oxygen consumption (single‐leg: 103 ± 11 mL kg −1 min −1 and double‐leg: 84 ± 21 mL kg −1 min −1 ; p < 0.01) and cardiac output (single‐leg: 1407 ± 334 mL kg −1 min −1 and double‐leg: 850 ± 222 mL kg −1 min −1 ; p < 0.01), compared with double‐leg cycling. Mean arterial pressure (double‐leg: 108 ± 11 mmHg and single‐leg: 102 ± 10 mmHg), change in total haemoglobin content (double‐leg: 8.76 ± 10.65 µM cm s −1 and single‐leg: 13.42 ± 4.10 µM cm s −1 ) and change in tissue oxygenation index (double‐leg: −4.51 ± 3.56% and single‐leg: −3.97 ± 3.91%) were not different between double‐leg and single‐leg cycling. When compared to double‐leg cycling, single‐leg cycling elicited a higher cardiac output relative to the lean mass, but this did not result in greater power output. The dissociation between blood availability and power output is consistent with an ageing model characterised by a decrease in local oxygen delivery and distribution capability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gordon et al. (2019) studied Healthy middle-aged adults (n=15). Single-leg cycling vs. Double-leg cycling was evaluated on Normalised power output (W kg-1) (p=< 0.05). Single-leg cycling resulted in lower normalized power output (8.92 vs 10.41 W/kg; p<0.05) but greater oxygen consumption and cardiac output compared with double-leg cycling in healthy adults.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: