Why the study?
Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality are elevated in hemodialysis patients with an increased prevalence of arrhythmias, but the prevalence of AF remains to be better understood and managed using portable screening devices.
Does screening with a portable device accurately detect subclinical atrial fibrillation in hemodialysis patients?
Does screening with a portable device accurately detect subclinical atrial fibrillation in hemodialysis patients?
A portable screening device demonstrated high sensitivity and negative predictive value for detecting subclinical atrial fibrillation during hemodialysis sessions, revealing a 1.8% prevalence.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May aid subclinical AF detection in hemodialysis patients; hypothesis-generating given cross-sectional design and requires prospective confirmation.
Background Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality rates are higher in hemodialysis (HD) patients, with an increased prevalence of arrhythmias. Atrial fibrillation (AF) is an independent risk factor for mortality and thromboembolic events in dialysis patients. For a better understanding and management of AF in these patients, it is important to know its prevalence. The use of a portable device would be pioneering for this group of patients. Objective To screen HD patients for AF using a portable gadget and evaluate the device’s diagnostic performance. Methods HD patients at a tertiary hospital underwent AF screening during HD sessions using MyDiagnostick® (Applied Biomedical Systems). Multiple data were collected to evaluate potential associations. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. Results 388 patients were evaluated (female, 40.7%; mean age of 56.8 years old, SD ± 14.7; and HD time of 27 months, 10-57). Screening was positive in 16 (4.1%) patients. AF was confirmed by electrocardiogram in 7 (1.8%) patients. Male sex (p = 0.019), older age (p = 0.007), altered baseline electrocardiogram (p < 0.001), increased serum potassium (p = 0.021), reduced systolic blood pressure at the beginning of dialysis (p = 0.007), and stable angina (0.011) were associated with positive screening for AF. The device presented a 91.74% specificity (95% CI, 86.65% to 96.91%) and 100% sensitivity (95% CI, 100% to 100%), with a negative predictive value of 100% (95% CI, 100% to 100%) for AF screening. Conclusion The use of this device proved to be practical, with high sensitivity and excellent negative predictive value. Subclinical AF has a high prevalence and may be underestimated in this population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carvalho et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: