Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreJournal ClubResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeJournal ClubExplore
November 1, 2011Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy

Antiplatelet options for secondary prevention in acute coronary syndromes

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Why the study?

Do new P2Y12 inhibitors (prasugrel and ticagrelor) improve ischemic outcomes compared with clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes?

Population

Patients with acute coronary syndromes, including those after percutaneous coronary intervention with…

Comparison

New P2Y12 inhibitors (prasugrel and ticagrelor) vs Standard-dose clopidogrel

Design

Review

Authors

JSJohanne SilvainGCGuillaume CaylaSOStephen O’Connor

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Supports prasugrel or ticagrelor for net benefit in higher-risk ACS; leaves open optimal selection and bleeding management.

Structured PICO

Do new P2Y12 inhibitors (prasugrel and ticagrelor) improve ischemic outcomes compared with clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes?

P
Population
Patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS), including those after percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent implantation
I
Intervention
New P2Y12 inhibitors (prasugrel and ticagrelor)
C
Comparator
Standard-dose clopidogrel
O
Outcome
Ischemic outcomeshard clinical

Prasugrel and ticagrelor offer superior ischemic protection and better net clinical benefit compared to clopidogrel for secondary prevention in patients with acute coronary syndromes, despite a higher bleeding risk.

Cite This Study

Silvain et al. (2011) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1df12ccd67cee373350bc3https://doi.org/10.1586/erc.11.139
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share