Why the study?
Can breath-hold VEC MR imaging detect differences in coronary blood flow and vasodilator flow reserve between patients with HCM and healthy subjects?
Can breath-hold VEC MR imaging detect differences in coronary blood flow and vasodilator flow reserve between patients with HCM and healthy subjects?
Breath-hold VEC MR imaging is a viable noninvasive technique for demonstrating severely depressed coronary vasodilator flow reserve in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
May support noninvasive coronary flow reserve assessment in HCM via breath-hold VEC MR; hypothesis-generating before clinical adoption.
PURPOSE: To evaluate coronary blood flow per gram of myocardial mass and vasodilator flow reserve in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and in healthy subjects by using breath-hold velocity-encoded cine (VEC) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine patients with HCM and nine healthy volunteers were examined. Fast VEC MR images were obtained in an oblique imaging plane perpendicular to the coronary sinus before and after intravenous injection of dipyridamole (0.56 mg/kg). The products of mean velocity and cross-sectional area of the vessel were integrated to measure blood flow. Breath-hold cine MR images encompassing the entire left ventricle were acquired to quantify the left ventricular mass. RESULTS: In the basal state, the coronary blood flow per gram of myocardial mass was 0.74 mL/min/g +/- 0.23 in healthy subjects and 0.62 mL/min/g +/- 0.27 in patients with HCM. After administration of dipyridamole, coronary blood flow in patients with HCM increased to a level significantly less than that in healthy subjects (1.03 mL/min/g +/- 0.40 vs 2.14 mL/min/g +/- 0.51; P < .01), resulting in a severely depressed flow reserve ratio in patients with HCM compared with that in healthy subjects (1.72 +/- 0.49 vs 3.01 +/- 0.75; P < .01). CONCLUSION: Breath-hold VEC MR imaging is a noninvasive technique for evaluating coronary flow per gram of myocardial mass and coronary flow reserve.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kawada et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: