Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Ideally, health human resource (HHR) planning for maternal, child and youth health care should be based not only on an understanding of present and future health care needs, but also on well-defined health-related outcomes. Most of the previous HHR strategies have relied on predictive mathematical models based on the number of existing health care professionals (most often physician numbers) and changes in both total population and population demographics. However, alterations in demands related to health status (or ‘need’) or desired population healthrelated goals (or ‘outcomes’) were not specifically or strategically addressed. Given the unprecedented demand for resources from the impending ‘silver tsunami’ of aging baby boomers, ensuring that pregnant women, children and youth compete favourably for health care resources is vital. The present article offers examples of relatively accessible data sources that are available at a population level and suitable for assessing maternal and child health care needs, details the limitations of a simple needs-based approach, and describes a more comprehensive and relevant outcomes-based HHR planning horizon suitable for the 21st century. We also highlight the importance of innovative models of care that service an effective, sustainable and high-quality health care system. Finally, we argue that this new outcomesoriented, interprofessional framework will be the most effective strategy for improving maternal, child and youth health in Canada.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guttmann et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: