Why the study?
Deep-learning algorithms have been used to compute FFR from CCTA, but fully automated FFR calculation free from human input had not been achieved.
Does a fully automated 3D deep-learning model accurately estimate minimum FFR from CCTA data compared to invasive FFR in patients with coronary stenosis?
Population
1052 patients undergoing CCTA, including 131 with 30-90% stenosis undergoing invasive FFR
Comparison
Fully automated 3D deep-learning FFR vs visually determined CCTA >50% stenosis against invasive FFR
Design
Retrospective diagnostic accuracy study with Monte Carlo cross-validation
Authors
Loading...
May aid noninvasive FFR estimation from CCTA over visual stenosis grading; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Does a fully automated 3D deep-learning model accurately estimate minimum FFR from CCTA data compared to invasive FFR in patients with coronary stenosis?
A fully automated 3D deep-learning model can estimate minimum FFR from CCTA data with moderate accuracy, significantly outperforming visual assessment of stenosis severity.
Kumamaru et al. (2019) studied this question.