Why the study?
Most wearable photoplethysmography algorithms were evaluated on closed recordings or clinical transmission-mode datasets rather than reflective mode, and preprocessing filters are rarely documented and often overfitted.
A filter passband of 0.5 to 15.0 Hz is optimal for preprocessing raw reflective mode PPG signals from wearable devices to accurately detect pulse peaks.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Optimizes wearable PPG preprocessing for pulse detection; leaves open prospective clinical validation before practice adoption.
The optical measurement principle photoplethysmography has emerged in today's wearable devices as the standard to monitor the wearer's heart rate in everyday life. This cost-effective and easy-to-integrate technique has transformed from the original transmission mode pulse oximetry for clinical settings to the reflective mode of modern ambulatory, wrist-worn devices. Numerous proposed algorithms aim at the efficient heart rate measurement and accurate detection of the consecutive pulses for the derivation of secondary features from the heart rate variability. Most, however, have been evaluated either on own, closed recordings or on public datasets that often stem from clinical pulse oximeters in transmission instead of wearables' reflective mode. Signals tend furthermore to be preprocessed with filters, which are rarely documented and unintentionally fitted to the available and applied signals. We investigate the influence of preprocessing on the peak positions and present the benchmark of two cutting-edge pulse detection algorithms on actual raw measurements from reflective mode photoplethysmography. Based on 21806 pulse labels, our evaluation shows that the most suitable but still universal filter passband is located at 0.5 to 15.0Hz since it preserves the required harmonics to shape the peak positions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wolling et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: