Why the study?
Does remote monitoring improve outcomes and cost-effectiveness compared to conventional follow-up in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices?
Population
Patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices
Comparison
Advanced remote monitoring vs Routine office visits / conventional follow-up
Design
Review
Authors
Loading...
Supports consideration of remote monitoring in CIED care; leaves open definitive confirmation via randomized trials.
Does remote monitoring improve outcomes and cost-effectiveness compared to conventional follow-up in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices?
Remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices is a cost-effective strategy that decreases morbidity and mortality and aids in managing heart failure and atrial fibrillation.
Róka et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: