Why the study?
Does repetition of extrastimuli or a shorter basic drive train cycle length improve the induction of ventricular tachycardia in patients with documented VT/VF and coronary artery disease?
Does repetition of extrastimuli or a shorter basic drive train cycle length improve the induction of ventricular tachycardia in patients with documented VT/VF and coronary artery disease?
Repetition of extrastimuli or shortening the basic drive train cycle length to 300 msec does not increase the yield of ventricular tachycardia induction during programmed ventricular stimulation.
Does not support more aggressive stimulation protocols for VT induction; leaves open their role in refining risk stratification for CAD patients with VT/VF.
INTRODUCTION: There are considerable variations of uncertain importance in basic drive train cycle lengths and degree of repetition of extrastimuli used in programmed ventricular stimulation protocols in different laboratories. We compare prospectively three different stimulation protocols to examine the influence of a short basic drive train cycle length and repetition of extrastimuli on induction of ventricular tachycardia. METHODS AND RESULTS: Thirty consecutive patients who had documented ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation based on underlying coronary artery disease underwent programmed ventricular stimulation with each of the three study protocols. Protocol A used a basic drive train cycle length of 400 msec with each extrastimulus coupling interval delivered only once. Protocol B used the same basic drive train cycle length, but with each extrastimulus coupling interval repeated three times before decrementing. Protocol C used 300 msec as the cycle length of basic drive trains without repetition of extrastimuli. Sixty-three percent, 67%, and 63% of the study patients had ventricular tachycardia inducible with protocols A, B, and C, respectively (P = NS). Ventricular fibrillation was induced in 23% of the 30 patients in all three protocols. There were no significant differences in the mean cycle lengths of induced ventricular tachycardia, the number of extrastimuli used, and the coupling interval of the last extrastimulus inducing ventricular tachycardia among the three protocols. CONCLUSION: This study showed no clinical benefit for repetition of extrastimuli that have failed to induce a ventricular tachyarrhythmia during programmed ventricular stimulation. A short basic cycle length of 300 msec was not superior to 400 msec for induction of ventricular tachyarrhythmias. We recommend the use of basic cycle length 400 msec with delivery of each extrastimulus interval only once as the initial protocol for programmed ventricular stimulation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
LEE et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: