Why the study?
What are the outcomes and practical models for mechanical intervention after failed thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction?
What are the outcomes and practical models for mechanical intervention after failed thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction?
This review provides a practical model for managing patients requiring mechanical intervention after failed thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May guide select clinical decisions on rescue intervention; leaves open need for prospective trials to validate the model.
Revascularisation strategies for acute myocardial infarction have evolved from early admission to coronary care units, bed rest and cardiac rhythm monitoring, to thrombolytic therapy and primary angioplasty. Although mechanical intervention for a failed prior revascularisation attempt is common widespread clinical practice, the outcome of this two-step modality may yet be an issue of debate. The available evidence is selected and reviewed within a clinical reference framework. This enables the presentation of a practical model for all stakeholders participating in cardiovascular care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peels et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: