Key result
Matsunaga and Van de Water formulas outperform Bazett and Fridericia for QT rate-correction in canines.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to assess the QT-prolonging effects of the histamine H1 receptor antagonist terfenadine and evaluate four mathematical methods for rate-correction of the QT interval.
Matsunaga's and Van de Water's formulas are superior to Bazett's and Fridericia's for assessing QT-prolonging drugs in preclinical canine studies.
Hypothesis-generating for QT rate-correction in canine models; does not support changes to clinical QT assessment.
The QT-prolonging effects of the histamine H1 receptor antagonist terfenadine were assessed using the halothane-anesthetized canine model to evaluate four mathematical methods for rate-correction of the QT interval. Administration of a therapeutic dose of terfenadine (0.3 mg/kg, i.v., n =4) prolonged intraventricular conduction without affecting the other cardiovascular parameters. Additional administration of supra-therapeutic dose of terfenadine (3 mg/kg, i.v.) decreased the blood pressure as well as preload and afterload of the left ventricle, increased the heart rate and cardiac output, and prolonged the monophasic action potential duration (MAP90), effective refractory period and intraventricular conduction. The QTc obtained using FridericiaOs, Van de WaterOs and MatsunagaOs formulas was prolonged at 3 mg/kg while that obtained using BazettOs formula increased from 0.3 mg/kg. Correlation between the MAP90 during the sinus rhythm corrected by the formula of Van de Water or Matsunaga (cMAP90) versus MAP90(CL400) gave higher correlation coefficients than that corrected by BazettOs or FridericiaOs formulas. Therefore, MatsunagaOs and Van de WaterOs formulas would be better mathematical methods in comparison with BazettOs and FridericiaOs for the assessment of QT-prolonging drugs in dogs for preclinical studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2004 study studied Healthy (canine model) (n=4). Terfenadine vs. Pre-drug baseline was evaluated on Correlation coefficient between MAP90(CL400) and corrected MAP90(sinus) using Matsunaga's formula. Matsunaga's and Van de Water's formulas provided better rate-correction of the QT interval (correlation coefficients 0.900 and 0.898) than Bazett's and Fridericia's formulas in a canine model.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: