Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article analyzes properties and implications of multiperiod managerial labor contracts under two alternative hypotheses: incentives, in which productivity depends on unobservable effort, and learning, in which ability is unknown and is revealed over time. Shared and conflicting implications of these competing models are developed in terms of experience-earnings profiles and the relation between compensation and performance. I empirically examine these theoretical results by using a longitudinal sample of 1, 488 chief executive officers followed from 1974-1985. The data yield mixed evidence that generally supports the learning hypothesis over the incentive hypothesis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kevin J. Murphy (1986) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: