Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study assesses competing explanations of inmate collective action using data from a nationwide sample of 317 adult maximum‐and medium‐security state prisons. Most previous studies have relied on data from only those prisons that have experienced riots. Hence, the conditions thought to cause collective outbursts may be equally present in prisons that did not experience such action. The current design allows for a comparison of riot and nonriot prisons. Additionally, this study examines the forces that generate other forms of collective action in prison, such as minor disturbances and inmate work stoppages. The results show that the variables under the administrative‐control theory heading, but not the inmate‐balance theory heading, help account for these events. Some consideration is given to the possibility that these two theories are complementary explanations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Useem et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: