Why the study?
Does measurement of natriuretic peptides improve the diagnosis of left ventricular dysfunction in patients with suspected heart failure?
Does measurement of natriuretic peptides improve the diagnosis of left ventricular dysfunction in patients with suspected heart failure?
A multimodality approach combining natriuretic peptides and imaging is recommended for optimal evaluation of cardiac dysfunction etiology and severity.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support multimodality evaluation with natriuretic peptides plus imaging in suspected heart failure; leaves open optimal protocols for prospective validation.
Natriuretic peptides (NPs) are entered in current guidelines for heart failure (HF) diagnosis and management because of their high specificity and sensibility in screening patients with acute dyspnea. Due to their availability and relatively low cost, they became the first step examinations in HF patients evaluation at hospital admission together with clinical and chest radiography examination. NPs are released following any cardiac haemodynamic stress due to volume or pressure overload and should be considered as a mirror of cardiac condition helping in recognizing patients with poor outcome. Moreover, the exact role of NPs in early HF stages, in isolated diastolic dysfunction, and in general population is questioned. Several promising reports described their potential role; however, the wide cut-off definition, inclusion criteria, and intrinsic measurement biases do not actually consent to their clinical application in these settings. A multimodality strategy including both NPs and imaging studies appears to be the best strategy to define the cardiac dysfunction etiology and its severity as well as to identify patients with higher risk. In this review, we describe the current and potential role of NPs in patients with asymptomatic cardiac insufficiency, evaluating the requirement to obtain a better standardization for imaging as for laboratory criteria.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Palazzuoli et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: