Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective study finds a high preoperative CA19-9-to-CEA ratio predicts worse survival in stage I-III colorectal cancer, highlighting its utility for postsurgical risk stratification.
Background: During colorectal cancer (CRC) surveillance, tumor markers, such as carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), play important roles in the diagnosis, prediction, and monitoring of tumors. Herein, we devised a novel combined index comprising the CA19-9-to-CEA ratio and investigated its prognostic value in patients with stage I-III CRC after resection. Methods: This retrospective study included 306 patients who underwent radical resection between 2011 and 2020. CA19-9 and CEA levels were evaluated preoperatively. The CA19-9-to-CEA ratio cutoff value was determined via receiver-operating characteristic analysis using the survival status at the 5-year follow-up evaluation. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: According to the multivariate analysis, T3 or T4 tumor ( P = 0.041; hazard ratio [HR], 2.54), pathological stage III ( P = 0.001; HR, 3.07), serum CEA level ≥5.0 ng/mL ( P = 0.018; HR, 2.11), and high CA19-9-to-CEA ratio ( P = 0.015; HR, 2.89) were independently associated with DFS. Age 65≥ years ( P = 0.03; HR, 2.86), pathological stage III ( P = 0.001; HR, 2.00), high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio ( P = 0.003; HR, 2.27), and high CA19-9-to-CEA ratio ( P = 0.009; HR, 3.16) were independent prognostic factors for OS. Patients with high CA19-9-to-CEA ratios had significantly worse DFS ( P < 0.001) and OS ( P < 0.001). Discussion: A high CA19-9-to-CEA ratio can be used for detailed risk prediction in patients with CRC.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aida et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: