Key result
Paced breathing combined with pleasant images reduced tidal volume and the intensity and unpleasantness of dyspnea compared to paced breathing with a vertical bar.
Why the study?
Does induced positive affect reduce dyspnea during slow paced breathing?
Does induced positive affect reduce dyspnea during slow paced breathing?
Inducing positive affect via pleasant images during slow paced breathing reduces tidal volume and dyspnea, which may improve tolerance of cardiovascular resonance training.
May improve tolerance of cardiovascular resonance training; leaves open whether positive affect augments its efficacy.
Slow breathing is used to induce cardiovascular resonance, a state associated with health benefits, but it can also increase tidal volume and associated dyspnea (respiratory discomfort). Dyspnea may be decreased by induced positive affect. In this study, 71 subjects (36 men, M = 20 years) breathed at 6 breaths per min. In condition one, subjects paced their breathing by inhaling and exhaling as a vertical bar moved up and down. In condition two, breathing was paced by a timed slideshow of positive images; subjects inhaled during a black screen and exhaled as the image appeared. Cardiac, respiratory, and self-reported dyspnea and emotional indices were recorded. Tidal volume and the intensity and unpleasantness of dyspnea were reduced when paced breathing was combined with pleasant images. These results show that positive affect can reduce dyspnea during slow paced breathing, and may have applications for induced cardiovascular resonance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Allen et al. (2012) studied this question. Paced breathing combined with pleasant images vs. Paced breathing with a vertical bar was evaluated on Tidal volume and the intensity and unpleasantness of dyspnea. Paced breathing combined with pleasant images reduced tidal volume and the intensity and unpleasantness of dyspnea compared to paced breathing with a vertical bar.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: