Key result
Paced breathing at 0.1 Hz decreased unpleasant arousal only among men and led to moderate hyperventilation, but did not increase affective arousal.
Why the study?
Does paced breathing at 0.1 Hz alter affective state, cardiovascular activity, and adequacy of ventilation compared to breathing at 0.28 Hz?
RCT (n=83)
Randomly assigned to one of three groups
Does paced breathing at 0.1 Hz alter affective state, cardiovascular activity, and adequacy of ventilation compared to breathing at 0.28 Hz?
Slow paced breathing at 0.1 Hz leads to moderate hyperventilation, which is associated with a decrease in unpleasant arousal, particularly in men.
May modestly reduce unpleasant arousal in men via ventilation shifts; leaves open mechanisms tying physiology to affect in untrained adults.
The present study aimed to investigate changes induced by breathing at 0.1 Hz in affective state, cardiovascular activity, and adequacy of ventilation as well as the relation between changes in peripheral physiological processes and alteration of affect. Eighty‐three participants were randomly assigned to one of three groups: Two groups doing paced breathing at 0.1 Hz, one with and the other without a cover story hiding the goal of the experiment, and, as a control, paced breathing at 0.28 Hz. We measured the effects of breathing at 0.1 Hz on affective state (unpleasant and pleasant arousals), respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA), sympathetic control of the heart (preejection period, PEP), and adequacy of ventilation as measured by partial pressure of end‐tidal CO 2 (PetCO 2 ). The use of a cover story did not influence the effects of paced breathing on the study outcomes. In the 0.1 Hz groups, unpleasant arousal decreased only among men. Changes in RSA were not related to changes in affect. Respiratory frequency did not influence PEP. However, changes in PEP were inversely related to changes in pleasant arousal. PetCO 2 decreased in all conditions, and a larger drop in PetCO 2 predicted a greater decrease in unpleasant arousal. The results obtained corroborate previous findings showing that slow paced breathing may lead to moderate hyperventilation among untrained participants and suggest that hyperventilation during breathing at 0.1 Hz is not deep enough to produce an increase in affective arousal.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Szulczewski et al. (2018) reported an RCT. Paced breathing at 0.1 Hz vs. Paced breathing at 0.28 Hz was evaluated on Affective state, respiratory sinus arrhythmia, preejection period, and partial pressure of end-tidal CO2. Paced breathing at 0.1 Hz decreased unpleasant arousal only among men and led to moderate hyperventilation, but did not increase affective arousal.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: