Why the study?
Does left atrial epicardial radiofrequency ablation improve long-term sinus rhythm and quality of life in patients with AF undergoing cardiac surgery?
Does left atrial epicardial radiofrequency ablation improve long-term sinus rhythm and quality of life in patients with AF undergoing cardiac surgery?
Left atrial epicardial RF ablation during CABG significantly increases the likelihood of long-term sinus rhythm, which is associated with improved quality of life and cardiac function.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support epicardial ablation during CABG for AF; hypothesis-generating and needs RCT confirmation before practice change.
AIMS: Our aim was to compare the long-term effects on rhythm and quality of life (QoL) after left atrial epicardial radiofrequency (RF) ablation vs. no ablation in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. METHODS AND RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients with ECG documented atrial fibrillation (AF) scheduled for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with or without concomitant valve surgery were consecutively elected for epicardial RF ablation. Thirty-nine age- and gender-matched patients scheduled for CABG with or without concomitant valve surgery only and with documented AF served as controls. The follow-up after ablation was 32 +/- 11 months. The percentage of patients in sinus rhythm (SR) at long-term follow-up was 62 vs. 33% (P = 0.03) after ablation and no ablation, respectively. SR at 3 months was highly predictive of that at 32 months (sensitivity 95%, positive predictive value 86%). Long-term SR was associated with better QoL, fewer symptoms, higher ejection fraction, and smaller left and right atria than AF. CONCLUSION: SR at 3 months was highly predictive of long-term SR that was associated with clinical improvement when compared with patients still in AF. AF at 3 months did not preclude a later stabilization to SR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Johansson et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: