Key result
Pregnancy SMBP empowers women and promotes shared responsibility rather than over-medicalizing care, healthcare professionals report.
Why the study?
This process evaluation aimed to understand healthcare professionals' perspectives and experiences of the BUMP trials evaluating blood pressure self-monitoring during pregnancy.
Observational (n=350)
Yes
Healthcare professionals view self-monitoring of blood pressure in pregnancy as an empowering tool that enriches clinical encounters without over-medicalising care.
Supports clinician discussions of self-monitoring in pregnancy hypertension; leaves open outcome impact pending prospective trials.
BACKGROUND: The BUMP trials evaluated a self-monitoring of blood pressure intervention in addition to usual care, testing whether they improved detection or control of hypertension for women at risk of hypertension or with hypertension during pregnancy. This process evaluation aimed to understand healthcare professionals' perspectives and experiences of the BUMP trials of self-monitoring of blood pressure during pregnancy. METHODS: Twenty-two in-depth qualitative interviews and an online survey with 328 healthcare professionals providing care for pregnant people in the BUMP trials were carried out across five maternity units in England. RESULTS: Analysis used Normalisation Process Theory to identify factors required for successful implementation and integration into routine practice. Healthcare professionals felt self-monitoring of blood pressure did not over-medicalise pregnancy for women with, or at risk of, hypertension. Most said self-monitored readings positively affected their clinical encounters and professional roles, provided additive information on which to base decisions and enriched their relationships with pregnant people. Self-monitoring of blood pressure shifts responsibilities. Some healthcare professionals felt women having responsibility to decide on timing of monitoring and whether to act on self-monitored readings was unduly burdensome, and resulted in healthcare professionals taking additional responsibility for supporting them. CONCLUSIONS: Despite healthcare professionals' early concerns that self-monitoring of blood pressure might over-medicalise pregnancy, our analysis shows the opposite was the case when used in the care of pregnant people with, or at higher risk of, hypertension. While professionals retained ultimate clinical responsibility, they viewed self-monitoring of blood pressure as a means of sharing responsibility and empowering women to understand their bodies, to make judgements and decisions, and to contribute to their care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chisholm et al. (2024) conducted an observational in Pregnancy hypertension (n=350). Self-monitoring of blood pressure was evaluated on Healthcare professional experiences and perspectives. Healthcare professionals viewed self-monitoring of blood pressure during pregnancy as a means of sharing responsibility and empowering women, rather than over-medicalizing their care.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: