Key result
Comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation significantly decreased systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, and arterial pressure volume index, and increased the coefficient of variation of the R-R interval over 3 months in patients with cardiovascular disease.
Why the study?
Does comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation improve arterial stiffness, blood pressure, and heart rate variability measured by simple non-invasive tests in patients with cardiovascular disease?
Cohort (n=64)
No
Does comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation improve arterial stiffness, blood pressure, and heart rate variability measured by simple non-invasive tests in patients with cardiovascular disease?
A 3-month cardiac rehabilitation program significantly improved blood pressure, arterial stiffness, and parasympathetic nervous activity, which can be effectively monitored using simple non-invasive devices in the clinic.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports non-invasive monitoring of BP, stiffness, and HRV during rehab; hypothesis-generating pending randomized confirmation.
Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) improves cardiac function and exercise capacity in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD). Simpler techniques are needed for use by physicians in the examination room to assess the usefulness of CR. We enrolled 46 consecutive CVD patients in a CR program (CR group) and prospectively followed them for 3 months. We compared them to 18 age-, gender- and body mass index-matched CVD patients without CR (non-CR group). Various parameters were measured at baseline and after 3 months using 3 simple non-invasive tests: severity of atherosclerosis [arterial velocity pulse index and arterial pressure volume index (API)] were determined using PASESA®, an autonomic nerve total activity amount index and a coefficient of variation of the R-R interval (CVRR) were determined using eHEART®, and peripheral resistance index, pressure rate product, stroke volume and cardiac index were determined using nico®]. There were no significant differences in patient characteristics including percentages (%) of ischemic heart disease and heart failure between the non-CR and CR groups. Systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic BP, heart rate and API at baseline significantly decreased and CVRR at baseline significantly increased after 3 months in the CR group, but not in the non-CR group. In addition, ΔAPI (Δ = the value after 3 months minus the value at baseline) was positively associated with ΔSBP in the CR group. In conclusion, CR significantly decreased BP and improved atherosclerosis and sympathetic nerve activity. These findings suggest that simple non-invasive tests may be useful for assessing the effects of CR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ueda et al. (2016) conducted a cohort in Cardiovascular disease (n=64). Comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation vs. Standard pharmacological care alone was evaluated on Changes in systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, arterial pressure volume index (API), and coefficient of variation of the R-R interval (CVRR) (p=<0.05). Comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation significantly decreased systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, and arterial pressure volume index, and increased the coefficient of variation of the R-R interval over 3 months in patients with cardiovascular disease.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: