Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The language of science communication has moved from deficit to dialogue and talk of a ‘new social contract’ with the public ‘invited to participate’. This paper outlines a practitioner path that begins with storytelling and moves to a more participatory mode of practice of science communication for adaptation to climate change at the community scale. I outline personal practitioner reflections, specifically the need to consider issues of power, place, pain and the need to challenge assumptions. I propose the need to consider context, many forms of local knowledge and expertise, social learning, plus the pain of historical, contemporary or projected loss.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anne Leitch (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: