Key result
Cold-pressor sensitivity is linked to significantly higher pain scores and stronger BP and HR increases.
Why the study?
Factors influencing cold-pressor pain sensitivity readouts were not systematically explored, including whether local tissue-related factors or nociceptive system gain settings contribute.
Does cold-pressor sensitivity correlate with systemic cardiovascular responses and generalized pain traits in healthy subjects?
Observational
Does cold-pressor sensitivity correlate with systemic cardiovascular responses and generalized pain traits in healthy subjects?
Absolute Event Rate: 78.6% vs 29.5%
p-value: p=<0.0001
Differences in nociceptive signal processing drive systemic cardiovascular responses during cold exposure, with baroreceptor activation suppressing pain and cardiovascular responses more efficiently in cold-pressor-insensitive subjects.
Hypothesis-generating link of cold-pressor sensitivity to pain and pressor responses in healthy subjects; leaves open predictive value for clinical pain or hypertension.
Pain sensitivity of healthy subjects in the cold-pressor (CP) test was proposed to be dichotomously distributed and to represent a pain sensitivity trait. Still, it has not been systematically explored which factors influence this pain sensitivity readout. The aim of this study was to distinguish potential contributions of local tissue-related factors such as perfusion and thermoregulation or gain settings in nociceptive systems. Cold-pressor-sensitive and CP-insensitive students screened from a medical student laboratory course were recruited for a CP retest with additional cardiovascular and bilateral local vascular monitoring. In addition, comprehensive quantitative sensory testing according to Deutscher Forschungsverbund Neuropathischer Schmerz standards and a sustained pinch test were performed. Cold pressor was reproducible across sessions (Cohen kappa 0.61 ± 0.14, P < 0.005). At 30 seconds in ice water, CP-sensitive subjects exhibited not only more pain (78.6 ± 26.3 vs 29.5 ± 17.5, P < 0.0001) but also significantly stronger increases in mean arterial blood pressure (12.6 ± 9.3 vs 5.6 ± 8.1 mm Hg, P < 0.05) and heart rate (15.0 ± 8.2 vs 7.1 ± 6.2 bpm, P < 0.005), and lower baroreflex sensitivity, but not local or vasoconstrictor reflex-mediated microcirculatory responses. Cold-pressor-sensitive subjects exhibited significantly lower pain thresholds also for cold, heat, and blunt pressure, and enhanced pain summation, but no significant differences in Aδ-nociceptor-mediated punctate mechanical pain. In conclusion, differences in nociceptive signal processing drove systemic cardiovascular responses. Baroreceptor activation suppressed pain and cardiovascular responses more efficiently in CP-insensitive subjects. Cold-pressor sensitivity generalized to a pain trait of C-fiber-mediated nociceptive channels, which was independent of local thermal and vascular changes in the ice-water-exposed hand. Thus, the C-fiber pain trait reflects gain setting of the nociceptive system.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Martel et al. (2024) conducted an observational in Pain sensitivity. Cold-pressor sensitivity vs. Cold-pressor insensitivity was evaluated on Pain score at 30 seconds in ice water (p=<0.0001). Cold-pressor sensitivity was associated with significantly higher pain scores (78.6 vs 29.5, P<0.0001) and stronger increases in blood pressure and heart rate compared to insensitivity.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: