Key result
Cuff-based central ABPM shows no stronger association with renal damage than peripheral ABPM.
Why the study?
Does 24-hour central blood pressure improve the prediction of renal organ damage compared to peripheral blood pressure in patients with essential hypertension?
Cross-Sectional (n=208)
Yes
Does 24-hour central blood pressure improve the prediction of renal organ damage compared to peripheral blood pressure in patients with essential hypertension?
Central blood pressure estimated by cuff-based oscillometry does not provide superior prediction of renal organ damage compared to standard brachial ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in hypertensive patients.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Central blood pressure (BP) has been suggested to be a better estimator of hypertension-associated risks. We aimed to evaluate the association of 24-hour central BP, in comparison with 24-hour peripheral BP, with the presence of renal organ damage in hypertensive patients. METHODS: Brachial and central (calculated by an oscillometric system through brachial pulse wave analysis) office BP and ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) data and aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV) were measured in 208 hypertensive patients. Renal organ damage was evaluated by means of the albumin to creatinine ratio and the estimated glomerular filtration rate. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients (25.9%) were affected by renal organ damage, displaying either microalbuminuria (urinary albumin excretion ≥30 mg/g creatinine) or an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 ml/min/1.73 m2. Compared to those without renal abnormalities, hypertensive patients with kidney damage had higher values of office brachial systolic BP (SBP) and pulse pressure (PP), and 24-h, daytime, and nighttime central and brachial SBP and PP. They also had a blunted nocturnal decrease in both central and brachial BP, and higher values of aortic PWV. After adjustment for age, gender, and antihypertensive treatment, only ABPM-derived BP estimates (both central and brachial) showed significant associations with the presence of renal damage. Odds ratios for central BP estimates were not significantly higher than those obtained for brachial BP. CONCLUSION: Compared with peripheral ABPM, cuff-based oscillometric central ABPM does not show a closer association with presence of renal organ damage in hypertensive patients. More studies, however, need to be done to better identify the role of central BP in clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fernández‐Llama et al. (2017) conducted a cross-sectional in Essential hypertension (n=208). 24-hour central blood pressure vs. 24-hour peripheral blood pressure was evaluated on Presence of renal organ damage (microalbuminuria or eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m2). Cuff-based oscillometric central ABPM does not show a closer association with the presence of renal organ damage compared to peripheral ABPM in hypertensive patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: