This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
The rapid growth of Internet-of-Things (IoT) in the current decade has led to the development of a multitude of new access technologies targeted at low-power, wide area networks (LP-WANs). However, this has also created another challenge pertaining to technology selection. This paper reviews the performance of LP-WAN technologies for IoT, including design choices and their implications. We consider Sigfox, LoRaWAN, WavIoT, random phase multiple access (RPMA), narrowband IoT (NB-IoT), as well as LTE-M and assess their performance in terms of signal propagation, coverage and energy conservation. The comparative analyses presented in this paper are based on available data sheets and simulation results. A sensitivity analysis is also conducted to evaluate network performance in response to variations in system design parameters. Results show that each of RPMA, NB-IoT, and LTE-M incurs at least 9 dB additional path loss relative to Sigfox and LoRaWAN. This paper further reveals that with a 10% improvement in receiver sensitivity, NB-IoT 882 MHz and LoRaWAN can increase coverage by up to 398% and 142%, respectively, without adverse effects on the energy requirements. Finally, extreme weather conditions can significantly reduce the active network life of LP-WANs. In particular, the results indicate that operating an IoT device in a temperature of -20 °C can shorten its life by about half; 53% (WavIoT, LoRaWAN, Sigfox, NB-IoT, and RPMA) and 48% in LTE-M compared with environmental temperature of 40 °C.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ikpehai et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: