Key result
Implementation of a standardized cardio-oncology service line model across a multi-hospital system increased patient access, expanding the service area 17-fold and increasing office visits by approximately 600% over three years.
Why the study?
Cancer patients remain underserved from a cardiovascular perspective, creating a need for a new care model integrating comprehensive cardio-oncology care with community-based facilities to improve access, quality, and equity.
Does a standardized cardio-oncology service line model improve care access and quality measures in a large multi-hospital health system?
Observational
Yes
Does a standardized cardio-oncology service line model improve care access and quality measures in a large multi-hospital health system?
A standardized cardio-oncology service line model is feasible and significantly improves patient access, clinic volume, and clinical workflow quality measures across a multi-hospital system.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports scaled cardio-oncology access models in health systems; leaves open outcome and equity effects.
BACKGROUND: Despite the rapid growth of cardio-oncology as a subspecialty, cancer patients are still underserved from a cardiovascular perspective. A new care model is needed to integrate comprehensive cardio-oncology care with community-based facilities to improve care access, quality, and equity. Here, we present a cardio-oncology service line model for large, multi-hospital health systems to address this need. METHODS: An academic cardio-oncology program was first established using a multidisciplinary approach. Five infrastructure elements for a service line model were created, including strategic accountability, standardized care, dedicated resources, patient experience/education, and branding/identity. We then utilized these elements across our healthcare system to establish a quality-controlled and centrally governed cardio-oncology service line structure. Protocols were created to standardize care and ensure consistency and quality, including referral workflow, imaging, cardiotoxicity surveillance, and clinical management. An IRB-approved cardio-oncology registry was established for outcome tracking. RESULTS: The standardized cardio-oncology services were expanded to eight hospitals and ten outpatient care centers, including rural outreach offices, resulting in increased patient access and improved clinical quality measures. The service area expanded 17-fold, and an estimated rural population of 204,133 gained access to care. Cardio-oncology office visits increased by approximately 600% three years after implementation of the service line model. CONCLUSIONS: A cardio-oncology service line with standardized care is a feasible and effective care model to improve cardio-oncology care quality, patient access, and health equity in large, multi-hospital health systems. It can be used in conjunction with academic cardio-oncology programs to improve the overall cardio-oncology healthcare efficacy in the US.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yan Liu (2023) conducted an observational in Cardiovascular disease in cancer patients. Cardio-oncology service line model vs. Pre-implementation baseline was evaluated on Cardio-oncology office visits (600% increase). Implementation of a standardized cardio-oncology service line model across a multi-hospital system increased patient access, expanding the service area 17-fold and increasing office visits by approximately 600% over three years.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: