Key result
LV aneurysm is linked to a ~45% higher risk of LV thrombus formation post-MI.
Why the study?
Predictors of left ventricular thrombus formation and resolution after acute myocardial infarction and LV dysfunction needed updating to reflect contemporary practice.
What are the predictors of left ventricular thrombus formation and delayed resolution in patients with post-acute myocardial infarction and severe left ventricular dysfunction?
Cohort (n=979)
No
What are the predictors of left ventricular thrombus formation and delayed resolution in patients with post-acute myocardial infarction and severe left ventricular dysfunction?
Hazard Ratio: 1.45 (95% CI 1.11–2.07)
p-value: p=0.024
In patients with post-acute myocardial infarction and severe left ventricular dysfunction, factors such as LV aneurysm, higher apical wall motion score index, late presentation, older age, lower LVEF, and higher LDL-C predict left ventricular thrombus formation, while LV aneurysm and thrombus size predict its persistence beyond 3 months.
Background: The predictors of left ventricular thrombus (LVT) formation and resolution, post-acute myocardial infarction (MI), and left ventricular (LV) dysfunction significantly impact management strategies and need updating to reflect contemporary practice. Methods: Transthoracic echocardiography was used to screen and assess post-acute MI patients with LV ejection fraction (LVEF) <35% or <40% with apical akinesis or dyskinesis. Results: We enrolled 979 patients. Of them, 67 (6.84%) patients had an LVT at the baseline. Additionally, 22 and 7 patients developed new LVT at 1 and 3 months. The predictors of LVT formation were the presence of LV aneurysm (HR: 1.45, 95% CI: 1.11-2.07, P=0.024), apical wall motion score index (WMSI) (HR: 1.36, 95% CI: 1.07-2.82, P=0.036), late presentation after MI (HR: 1.32, 95% CI: 1.16-3.16, P=0.042), older age (HR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.08-3.36, P=0.043), lower baseline LVEF (HR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.06-2.75, P=0.046) and higher level of low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) (HR: 1.18, 95% CI: 1.02-2.54, P=0.049). The LVT was resolved in 40 (59.7%) and 32 patients (65.3%) at 1 and 3 months, respectively. The predictors of LVT persistence beyond 3 months were LV aneurysm (HR: 1.55, 95% CI: 1.03-1.87, P=0.024), LVT size at baseline (HR: 1.43, 95% CI: 1.32-2.74, P=0.031), apical WMSI (HR: 1.43, 95% CI: 1.32-2.74, P=0.031), lower LVEF (HR: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.02-2.54, P=0.043) and late presentation after MI (HR: 1.18, 95% CI: 1.07-2.16, P=0.047). Conclusions: The global and apical LV systolic dysfunction, older age, late presentation, and high LDL-C predict LVT formation post-MI. These factors and LVT size predict LVT persistence beyond 3 months. These findings should guide anticoagulation therapy in this high-risk population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Youssef et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in Post-acute anterior wall myocardial infarction with severe left ventricular dysfunction (n=979). Left ventricular aneurysm vs. Absence of left ventricular aneurysm was evaluated on Left ventricular thrombus formation (HR 1.45, 95% CI 1.11-2.07, p=0.024). The presence of a left ventricular aneurysm was a significant independent predictor of left ventricular thrombus formation post-myocardial infarction (HR 1.45).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: