Key result
Thrombus resolution after acute coronary syndrome was independently associated with a significantly lower risk of all-cause death (HR 0.14; 95% CI 0.03-0.75; p=0.021).
Why the study?
Profound data on long-term outcome and associated antithrombotic treatment strategies in ACS patients with left ventricular thrombus are scarce.
Does triple antithrombotic therapy with ticagrelor/prasugrel improve left ventricular thrombus resolution, and does resolution reduce mortality and MACE in patients with ACS?
Cohort (n=43)
Does triple antithrombotic therapy with ticagrelor/prasugrel improve left ventricular thrombus resolution, and does resolution reduce mortality and MACE in patients with ACS?
Hazard Ratio: 0.14 (95% CI 0.03–0.75)
p-value: p=.021
In patients with ACS and left ventricular thrombus, thrombus resolution is strongly protective against mortality and MACE, and may be facilitated by triple antithrombotic therapy including ticagrelor or prasugrel.
Thrombus resolution may lower mortality in ACS with LV thrombus; leaves open whether TAT with ticagrelor/prasugrel facilitates it.
BACKGROUND: Left ventricular thrombus (LVT) is a rare but dreaded complication during the acute phase of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, profound data on long-term outcome and associated antithrombotic treatment strategies of this highly vulnerable patient population are scarce in current literature. METHODS: Patients presenting with ACS were screened for presence of LVT and subsequently included within a prospective clinical registry. All-cause mortality and the composite of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and thromboembolic events were defined as primary and secondary endpoint. RESULTS: Within 43 patients presenting with LVT, thrombus resolution during patient follow-up was observed in 27 individuals (62.8%). Patients that reached a resolution of LVT experienced lower incidence rates of death (-23.9%; p = .022), MACE (-37.8%; p = .005), and thromboembolic events (-35.2%; p = .008). Even after adjustment for clinical variables, thrombus resolution showed an independent inverse association with all-cause death with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.14 (95% CI: 0.03-0.75; p = .021) and as well with MACE with a HR of 0.22 (95% CI: 0.07-0.68; p = .008) and thromboembolic events with a HR of 0.22 (95% CI: 0.06-0.75; p = .015). Triple antithrombotic therapy (TAT) with ticagrelor/prasugrel showed a strong and independent association with thrombus resolution with an adjusted HR of 3.25 (95% CI: 1.22-8.68; p = .019) compared to other strategies. CONCLUSION: The presented data indicate a poor outcome of ACS patients experiencing LVT. In terms of a personalized risk stratification, thrombus resolution has a strong protective impact on both all-cause death and MACE with the potential to tailor treatment decisions-including an intensified antithrombotic treatment approach-in this patient population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hofer et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Left ventricular thrombus after acute coronary syndrome (n=43). Thrombus resolution vs. No thrombus resolution was evaluated on All-cause mortality (HR 0.14, 95% CI 0.03-0.75, p=.021). Thrombus resolution after acute coronary syndrome was independently associated with a significantly lower risk of all-cause death (HR 0.14; 95% CI 0.03-0.75; p=0.021).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: