Key result
Radiographic diagnosis of left atrial enlargement yielded high accuracy (AUC 0.93) and should be used to evaluate heart size and indirectly the severity of mitral regurgitation.
Why the study?
What is the accuracy and interreader variability of radiographic diagnosis of heart enlargement, left atrial enlargement, and heart failure in cavalier King Charles spaniels with mitral regurgitation?
Observational (n=16)
What is the accuracy and interreader variability of radiographic diagnosis of heart enlargement, left atrial enlargement, and heart failure in cavalier King Charles spaniels with mitral regurgitation?
Effect estimate: AUC for HE 0.89, LAE 0.93, HF 0.92
Left atrial enlargement, rather than overall heart enlargement, should be used to evaluate heart size and indirectly mitral regurgitation severity on radiographs, though interreader agreement for heart failure remains only moderate.
Radiographic LAE assessment may aid MR evaluation in CKCS; leaves open prospective validation of accuracy and HF interreader reliability.
OBJECTIVES: To measure accuracy and variability of diagnosis by radiography of heart enlargement (HE) and heart failure (HF) in mitral regurgitation (MR). METHODS: Sixteen readers representing four levels of experience evaluated 50 sets of radiographs with varying severity of MR for presence or absence of HE, left atrial enlargement (LAE) and HF. The performance of the readers was compared with a reference standard, using area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The interreader agreement value kappa (K) was calculated. A subset of difficult cases of HF was analysed before and after removing an outlying reader from each group. RESULTS: AUC for HE was 0.89, for LAE it was 0.93 and for HF it was 0.92. Experience increased certainty of diagnosis but not accuracy. K ranges were HE, 0.53 to 0.67; LAE, 0.61 to 0.69 and HF, 0.49 to 0.58. When only difficult cases of HF were read, accuracy decreased and experienced readers performed better than inexperienced. When outlying readers were excluded, the differences between experienced and inexperienced readers increased. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: LAE, not HE, should be used to evaluate the heart size and indirectly the severity of MR on radiographs. For HF, agreement among individual readers was only moderate. Studies of reader accuracy should consider the effects of interreader variability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hansson et al. (2009) conducted an observational in Mitral regurgitation (n=16). Radiographic diagnosis vs. Reference standard was evaluated on Accuracy of diagnosis (AUC) for heart enlargement (HE), left atrial enlargement (LAE), and heart failure (HF) (AUC for HE 0.89, LAE 0.93, HF 0.92). Radiographic diagnosis of left atrial enlargement yielded high accuracy (AUC 0.93) and should be used to evaluate heart size and indirectly the severity of mitral regurgitation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: