Conditions with increased sympathetic activity significantly slowed the carotid-cardiac baroreflex bradycardic response compared to supine rest (2-3 s vs <1 s).
Observational (n=6)
Does concurrent sympathetic stimulation (standing, exercise) slow the carotid-cardiac baroreflex in male subjects?
The carotid-cardiac baroreflex in humans is slowed under conditions of concurrent sympathetic stimulation such as standing or exercise.
We hypothesized that the carotid-cardiac baroreflex becomes slowed in conditions with increased sympathetic activity. Changes in heart rate (HR) and blood pressure in response to 10-s trains of 50-mmHg pulses of neck suction (NS) were studied in six male subjects during supine rest, upright rest, isometric arm exercise at 30% of maximum voluntary contraction, and dynamic leg exercise at 100 W in the sitting position. Estimated mean carotid distending pressure increased by approximately 20 mmHg with 50-mmHg, QRS-triggered, pulsatile NS. Repeated NS sequences were performed in each condition. The amplitude of the bradycardic response was highly variable among the subjects and did not differ significantly between conditions, mean values ranging from 0.3 to 0.6 beats.min-1.mmHg-1. In supine rest, the full bradycardic response appeared within < 1 s, i.e., during or immediately after the R-R interval of the first NS pulse. In the other conditions it took significantly longer, 2-3 s or three to seven R-R intervals, for the full HR responses to develop. Our results support the notion that the carotid-cardiac baroreflex in humans becomes slowed under conditions of concurrent sympathetic stimulation.
Sundblad et al. (Tue,) reported a observational. Conditions with increased sympathetic activity (upright rest, isometric arm exercise, dynamic leg exercise) vs. Supine rest was evaluated on Time for full bradycardic response to develop. Conditions with increased sympathetic activity significantly slowed the carotid-cardiac baroreflex bradycardic response compared to supine rest (2-3 s vs <1 s).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: