Key result
QKD100-60 was independent of 24-h systolic blood pressure in normal and treated hypertensive patients, but weakly related in untreated hypertensive patients (r = 0.249, P < 0.0001).
Why the study?
Structural arterial stiffness reflects long-term vascular damage, and this study investigated whether the QKD method (QKD100-60) can measure arterial stiffness independently of blood pressure.
Does the QKD method provide an index of arterial stiffness independent of 24-h systolic blood pressure?
Cross-Sectional (n=1,362)
Does the QKD method provide an index of arterial stiffness independent of 24-h systolic blood pressure?
Effect estimate: r = 0.249
p-value: p=< 0.0001
Ambulatory monitoring of QKD provides an index of arterial stiffness that is independent of 24-h blood pressure in normal and treated hypertensive patients, potentially refining cardiovascular risk assessment.
QKD100-60 may index stiffness independently of 24-h SBP in treated patients; hypothesis-generating in untreated and requires prospective validation.
OBJECTIVE: Arterial stiffness, an important predictor of cardiovascular event, has two components: one linked to the nonlinear elastic behaviour of the arterial wall and dependent of the blood pressure (BP) at the time of measurement, and the other linked to the structural modifications of the arterial wall as the consequences of the long-term effects of all cardiovascular risk factors, including BP. This second component is certainly the most important one and can be assessed with 24-h ambulatory monitoring of cardio-arm pulse transmission time (QKD method). METHODS: The working hypothesis of this study is that QKD100-60, the value of the QKD for a 100 mmHg SBP and 60 bpm heart rate is independent of 24-h SBP in both normotensive volunteers and treated hypertensive patients, in whom the long-term influence of BP is limited, whereas QKD100-60 is not independent of 24-h SBP in untreated hypertensive patients in whom high BP was able to damage the arterial wall on the long term. So we studied the relationships of QKD100-60 with 24-h BP and heart rate together with age, sex, height in multivariate regression analysis in three groups of patients; normal, untreated and treated hypertensive patients. QKD was measured with Novacor devices. RESULTS: In the normal population (n = 323, aged 29 ± 10 years) and in the treated hypertensive population (n = 425, aged 58 ± 13 years) the QKD100-60 was indeed not significantly related to 24-h SBP. In the untreated hypertensive population (n = 614, aged 51 ± 13 years) the QKD100-60 was weakly but significantly related to 24-h SBP (r = 0.249, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Ambulatory monitoring of QKD provides indices of arterial stiffness independent of BP level at the time of measurement and most interestingly of 24-h BP with the potential to refine risk in patients with low traditional risk scores.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gosse et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in Hypertension (n=1,362). QKD100-60 (cardio-arm pulse transmission time) was evaluated on Relationship of QKD100-60 with 24-h systolic blood pressure (r = 0.249, p=< 0.0001). QKD100-60 was independent of 24-h systolic blood pressure in normal and treated hypertensive patients, but weakly related in untreated hypertensive patients (r = 0.249, P < 0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: