Why the study?
Does dynamic exercise compared to atrial pacing alter the force-frequency and relaxation-frequency relations in patients with nonobstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
Does dynamic exercise compared to atrial pacing alter the force-frequency and relaxation-frequency relations in patients with nonobstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
In patients with nonobstructive HCM, exercise-induced enhancement of LV relaxation is universally inhibited, and enhancement of LV contraction is lost in those with more severe hypertrophy.
Universal lusitropic impairment during exercise in nonobstructive HCM warrants symptom-focused evaluation; leaves open hypertrophy severity's role in force-frequency response.
BACKGROUND: Exercise-induced enhancement of the force-frequency and relaxation-frequency relations has been studied in conscious animals but not in intact diseased human hearts. METHODS AND RESULTS: We evaluated left ventricular (LV) isovolumic contraction (dP/dt(max)) and relaxation (tau) during atrial pacing and dynamic exercise in 13 patients with nonobstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and 7 control subjects to investigate the influence of exercise on the force-frequency and relaxation-frequency relations. Group A consisted of 6 patients in whom the heart rate (HR)-dP/dt(max) relation was markedly enhanced during exercise (88+/-30%) compared with during pacing (34+/-15%). Group B consisted of 7 patients in whom the HR-dP/dt(max) relation showed similar enhancement during exercise (28+/-7%) and atrial pacing (28+/-11%). There was no difference in the HR-tau (derivative method [TD] and pressure half-time method [T(1/2)]) relation between pacing and exercise in groups A and B. Both the mean maximal wall thickness and the hypertrophy score in group B were greater than in group A (27+/-5 versus 19+/-2 mm and 7+/-1 versus 5+/-1 points, respectively; both P<.01). There was no difference in the LV peak systolic pressure, end-diastolic pressure, or the plasma level of catecholamines at baseline, at 50 W of exercise, and at peak pacing between groups A and B. The HR-dP/dt(max) relation in the control group was markedly enhanced during exercise (80+/-27%) compared with during pacing (32+/-14%). The HR-tau relation in the control group was enhanced during exercise (TD, 35+/-9%; T(1/2), 34+/-8%) compared with during pacing (TD, 12+/-7%; T(1/2), 14+/-7%). CONCLUSIONS: Exercise-induced enhancement of the relaxation-frequency relation was inhibited in all HCM patients, regardless of the degree of LV hypertrophy. The patients without exercise-induced enhancement of the force-frequency relation had more severe LV hypertrophy than the patients with the enhancement, indicating that the adrenergic control of the force-frequency relation may, at least in part, depend on the severity of LV hypertrophy or the stage of HCM.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Izawa et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: